版权声明：
以下内容来自微信公共帐号“EOS技术爱好者”，搜索“EOSTechLover”即可订阅，译者Lochaiching。转载必须保留以上声明。仅授权原文转载。
本文原文链接为https://forums.eosgo.io/discussion/719/article-viii-v0-3-0-draft-eos-io-constitution-block-producer-agreement，Thomas Cox在EOS GO社区中更新了宪法草案第八条的内容，由本号“EOS技术爱好者”翻译。
Article VIII - v0.3.0 Draft EOS.IO Constitution - Block Producer Agreement第8条：0.3.0版本EOS.IO宪法草案 ——《区块生产者协议》![]()
封面图片Thomas Cox
[h1]Purpose[/h1]This article authorizes a governance document, the Block Producer Agreement. It's intended to be a take-it-or-leave-it offer by the Members acting collectively and setting out what those Members want each Block Producer to do (and refrain from doing).
[h1]目的[/h1]本文授权了一个治理文档，即《区块生产者协议》。为了让全体成员共同采取 “要么接受要么放弃” 的提议，并设定好社区成员希望每个区块生产者做的事情 (以及避免做的事情) 的界限。
[h1]Text of Article[/h1]No Member shall serve as a Block Producer who has not agreed in advance to the Block Producer Agreement provided by the Members of this blockchain.
[h1]本文内容[/h1]若事先未对此区块链成员提供的《区块生产者协议》确认同意，任何人均不得以区块生产者自居。
[h1]Discussion[/h1]The Constitution is intended to be as brief as possible, and the Block Producer Agreement is potentially detailed. For that reason it was decided to separate that Agreement into its own document.
If the Constitution did not contain this Article, then the BP Agreement would be at best a nice-to-have rather than a must-have aspect of Governance.
It seems likely that Block Producers, seeking to signal their trustworthiness and attract votes, may agree to the Block Producer Agreement and also undertake additional promises. There's nothing wrong with BPs seeking to embrace a higher standard than whatever may be found in the Block Producer Agreement.
The method of agreeing is not specified. It's likely that the Ricardian Contract for the "RegProducer" system command, by which a Member registers themselves as a BP candidate, will include the BP Agreement by reference. If so, then the act of registering as a BP candidate will entail agreeing to the BP Agreement. If true, one might think this Article superfluous. But that is not so -- this Article raises the BP Agreement's status from a mere Contract to a Governing document co-equal to the Constitution itself. This gives the BP Agreement greater standing in cases of Arbitration; specifically, the BP Agreement like the Constitution overrule any Contract, should they be in conflict.
[h1]讨论[/h1]此宪法草案力求简明扼要，相比之下《区块生产者协议》也许会尽可能详细。因此决定将该协议到分类到自己的文件中去。
如果宪法的组成中没有这个内容，那么从治理方面看，《区块生产者协议》充其量是一份 “拥有的话比较好” 而不是 “必须拥有” 的存在。
区块生产者很有可能同意《区块生产者协议》并承诺更多额外的东西，来表明自己的可信度从而吸引选票。对于区块生产者比在《区块生产者协议》中有更高的追求标准，这本该没错。
同意的方法没有正式确定下来。很有可能会像李嘉图合约中的 “RegProducer” 系统命令，一个成员注册为区块生产者的候选人，其中包含参考资料中的《区块生产者协议》。按照这样的设置，那作为注册BP候选人的这个行为，意味着需要先同意《区块生产者协议》的内容。如果真是如此，大家可能会认为该条款是多余的。但事实并非如此，此条款将《区块生产者协议》的地位从仅仅是一份合同的协议，提升到与宪法相当的管理文件。这使《区块生产者协议》在仲裁案件中有了更高的地位；具体来说，《区块生产者协议》像《宪法》一样有权否决任何合同，如果其间有冲突的话。
[h1]References[/h1]A link to the latest Block Producer Agreement should go here once it is published.
*EOS New York Code of Conduct for reference. *
[h1]参考链接[/h1]（此协议）一旦发布，最新的《区块生产者协议》的链接就会在此处。
EOS New York Code of Conduct （https://steemit.com/eos/@eosnewyork/eos-new-york-code-of-conduct）供参考
[h2]Change History[/h2]26-Apr-2018: added link to EOS New York Code of Conduct in the References section.
[h2]修改历史[/h2]2018-4-28: 增加了* EOS New York Code of Conduct *在参考链接的部分
(all opinions are my own)
（所有的观点都代表我自己）
本文内容不代表本号任何立场
本文图片来源于网络
本文原文链接为https://forums.eosgo.io/discussion/719/article-viii-v0-3-0-draft-eos-io-constitution-block-producer-agreement ，作者Thomas Cox，译者Lochaiching。转载请参照本文文首说明。
更多内容，加入我们的知识星球吧～
![]()
WechatIMG2975.jpeg |
|
转播
