Isda驳斥了有关《多德弗兰克法案》治外法规问题的报道
国际掉期与衍生工具协会（Isda）日前驳斥了一篇有关它在2013年提供文件，使得相关公司能够免于《多德弗兰克法案》治外法规约束的报道。
新经济思想研究所（Inet）在其2018年6月的论文中特别提到了商品期货交易委员会（CFTC）2013年7月所指引的治外法规，该条款规定美国银行控股公司“担保”的境外子公司掉期交易商将受到《多德弗兰克法案》的约束，而没有担保的附属机构则不会收到该约束。
该文件声称：Isda提供的文件允许其成员通过在书面声明中勾选“非担保”选项来为其海外子公司提供支持，从而宣布这些新担保的海外子公司不受《多德弗兰克法案》约束 。因此Isda在周三的一份声明中强烈否认了这一说法。
Isda rebuts paper citing Dodd Frank extraterritoriality concerns
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (Isda) has rebutted claims that it provided documentation in 2013 which enabled firms to avoid the extraterritoriality rules contained within US post crisis legislation Dodd Frank.
The claims made by the Institute for New Economic Thinking (Inet) in its June 2018 paper specifically referred to the extraterritoriality provisions within the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC) July 2013 guidance, which stipulated that “guaranteed” foreign subsidiaries of US bank holding company swaps dealers would be subject to Dodd Frank, while non-guaranteed affiliates would not.
The paper claimed Isda provided documentation which allowed its members to “deguarantee” their foreign subsidiaries by simply checking a “deguarantee” box in a written declaration, thereby “proclaiming that those newly deguarantee foreign subsidiaries were not subject to Dodd Frank" - a claim Isda strongly denied in a statement on Wednesday.
|
|
转播
