版权声明：
以下内容来自微信公共帐号“EOS技术爱好者”，搜索“EOSTechLover”即可订阅，翻译Lochaiching。转载必须保留以上声明。仅授权原文转载。
本文原文链接为https://steemit.com/eos/@ecaf/what-ecaf-has-learned-since-the-launch-of-the-eos-mainnet ，由本号“EOS技术爱好者”翻译。
What ECAF has learned since the launch of the EOS MainNet自EOS主网启动以来，ECAF学到了什么![]()
rustic-3441673_640.jpg[h1]Introduction and Background[/h1][h1]介绍和背景[/h1]There has recently been a lot of discussion about the nature of Arbitration in EOS and the status of the EOS Core Arbitration Forum (ECAF). This post gives a retrospective of events over the past 5 weeks and presents the lessons that ECAF has learned.
最近，关于仲裁在EOS中的性质以及EOS核心仲裁论坛(ECAF)的地位，引发了大量的讨论。这篇文章回顾了过去5周的事件，并讲讲ECAF在其中得到的经验和思考。
The EOS MainNet launched a little over 5 weeks ago to a lot of fanfare. A default Constitution was put in place naming ECAF as the organisation to resolve disputes on the EOS blockchain according to its published Rules for Dispute Resolution (RDR). ECAF’s RDR which governs the way it makes rulings can be found here. However, the conversion of the EOS ERC-20 token to EOS MainNet token became a point of friction. Some Ethereum account holders fell prey to alleged phishing scams, others claimed to have lost their EOS private keys or even simply failed to register their ERC-20 tokens.
EOS 主网在5个多星期前启动，引起了很大的轰动。根据公布的纠纷解决规则(RDR)，制定了一项默认的公约（Constitution），将其命名为解决EOS区块链上纠纷的组织。ECAF的RDR管理裁决的方式可以在这里找到。然而，EOS ERC-20代币转换到EOS主网代币成为一个摩擦点。有些以太坊账户的持有者就遭到了所谓的钓鱼欺诈，有些则声称自己的EOS私钥已经丢失，有些甚至干脆没有注册ERC-20代币。
A very brief summary of the events that ensued immediately after: Claims were made to ECAF by 7 individuals to assist with accounts whose private keys had allegedly been compromised on the Ethereum network. To prevent imminent loss of funds, the 21 active Block Producers who were in office at that time unanimously elected to freeze the affected accounts on their own. As per procedure, the BPs subsequently filed a dispute against themselves seeking ECAF review of their action. Thereafter an Emergency Arbitrator was assigned to review this case, along with additional claims. The Emergency Arbitrator, upon review of the facts of those cases, ordered that the 7 accounts and a further 20 accounts be frozen pending further investigation. Most of those accounts are now in a blacklist and effectively frozen pending further action from ECAF.
我们来用简短的话来总结随后发生的事件：7个个人账号向ECAF提出申诉，以协助据称在以太坊网络上被泄露其私钥的账户。为了防止资金的流失，当时在任的21位BP一致决定冻结受影响的账户。按照程序，BP们随后对自己提出了ECAF对其行为进行审查的要求。之后，指派了一名紧急仲裁员，连同其他申诉要求一起审查。紧急仲裁员在审查了这些案件的事实后，下令冻结这7个帐户和另外20个帐户，等待进一步调查。目前，这些账户中的大多数都被列入了黑名单，在ECAF采取进一步行动之前，这些账户实际上已被冻结。
[h1]Issues surfaced[/h1][h1]问题浮出水面[/h1]Throughout this process, several issues surfaced. The most notable were as follows.
在整个过程中，出现了几个问题。最值得注意的几个如下：
[h2]Inconsistent constitutional agreement[/h2]The EOS Constitution is not shown to users in a consistent way and hence it is difficult to establish that they have agreed to it.
[h2]不一致的公约协议[/h2]EOS公约（Constitution）没有以一致的方式向用户显示，因此很难确定用户是否都同意它。
[h2]Poor awareness of Arbitration's existence[/h2]Despite references in both White Papers and in nearly every outbound communication about the governance of the system, many in the Community were not aware of the existence of Arbitration and the powers accorded to the Arbitrators. This led to baseless fears that ECAF and its Arbitrators were wielding “arbitrary powers”. Compounding this was the perception that ECAF was/is a shadowy body with an unclear membership, a perception unfortunately fueled by ECAF’s lack of a public communications officer or budget.
[h2]对仲裁存在的认识不足[/h2]尽管在白皮书和几乎所有关于系统治理的内容中都有提到仲裁，但社区中还是有许多人并不知道仲裁的存在以及仲裁员的权力限度。这导致了大部分人觉得ECAF及其仲裁员拥有“任意权力”，而这是没有根据的担忧。更糟糕的是，人们认为ECAF是一个成员不明确的影子主体。不幸的是，ECAF缺乏对外沟通的正式人员和预算，也让有这种看法的人产生越来越多的误解。
[h2]Lack of on-chain communications[/h2]There is no on-chain based system for account to account communication. As such at launch the BPs and ECAF had not yet established their communications protocol. Rulings were thus not communicated in a consistent manner, leading BPs in some cases to question their source, and in other cases apparently not to receive them at all.
[h2]缺乏链上沟通[/h2]目前没有基于链上账户之间的通信系统。在启动时，BP和ECAF还没有建立两者之间的通信协议。因此仲裁决定并没有用一个一致的方式来沟通，导致BP在某些情况下质疑它们来源的真实性，在其他情况下显然根本不接受这些裁决。
[h2]Lack of anticipation of the sensitivity around the potential for abuse of power[/h2]Although there are a multitude of checks and balances built into the system, ECAF failed to anticipate the sensitivity the Community would have to accusations, however baseless, of risks of abuse of power.
[h2]缺乏对权力滥用敏感性的预期[/h2]尽管在这个系统中构建了大量的检查和平衡机制，但ECAF未能预见到社区对滥用权力危险的指责，不管这些指责是否毫无根据。
[h2]Lack of funding[/h2]A lack of pre-launch funding meant that ECAF was not able to put in some of the structures it needed for efficient operation.
[h2]缺乏资金[/h2]由于缺乏启动前的资金，ECAF无法为建立有效运作所需的结构做支持。
[h2]Poor understanding of the Arbitration procedure[/h2]There is a broad lack of understanding of the detailed procedure.
1 cases are generally not public affairs.
2 the Emergency Arbitrator’s role is to set controls in motion quickly, in preparation for a later, more careful phase.
[h2]对仲裁程序了解不足[/h2]人们普遍缺乏对每一步程序的理解。
1、案件一般不是公共事务。
2、紧急仲裁员的作用是迅速地设置提案的控制，为以后更详尽的阶段做准备。
[h1]Areas for improvement[/h1][h1]需要改进的地方[/h1]To address these points ECAF has identified the following key areas for improvement:
为了解决这些问题，ECAF确定了重点需要改进的领域:
[h2]Forum transparency[/h2]1 ECAF will be modifying its website to ensure that its personnel are clear.
2 More visibility will be given to the Arbitrator nomination process. (We are still open for nominations by the way. Please see the criteria for Arbitrators and details of the nomination process hereand here. Nominations are to be made via the following telegram channel https://t.me/EOSArbNominations ).
[h2]论坛的透明度[/h2]1、ECAF将修改其网站以确保公众对其成员是有处可循的。
2、将对仲裁员提名程序给予更多的关注（顺便说一下，我们目前还接受提名。请在此处查看仲裁员的标准和提名过程的细节。提名将通过电报频道https://t.me/eosarb 进行）。
[h2]On and Off-chain Communications[/h2]1 In the absence of an on-chain messaging system, an on-chain process for the communication of Arbitral notices and rulings has been adopted, details are [here] (https://steemit.com/eos/@ecaf/draft-proposal-for-ecaf-s-official-notification-system). All Future official notices, orders, rulings, etc. will be capable of being authenticated and recorded on-chain and delivered from the official ECAF EOS account: ecafofficial.
2 ECAF will be recruiting one or more volunteer Community Manager(s) to help with coordinating our off-chain, non-case-specific communications. Know someone who is interested? Let us know using the links at the end of this post.
[h2]链上和链下的通信[/h2]1、在链上通信系统没有出现的情况下，仲裁通知和裁决的通信采用了链上程序，详情如链接（https://steemit.com/eos/@ecaf/draft-proposal-for-ecaf-s-official-notification-system ）。所有未来的官方通知、执行命令、裁决等将能够在链上被认证和记录，并从ECAF EOS官方账户：ecafofficial 交付。
2、ECAF将招募一名或多名志愿者作为社区经理，以协助我们的链下非个案的协调沟通。对这件事感兴趣吗？在这篇文章的结尾的链接可以找到我们。
[h2]Use of technology to enhance the Arbitration process[/h2]ECAF’s role is to provide the best support for the case file: storage of evidence and signalling of progress can be assisted by technology including blockchain DApps. ECAF is working with some members of the Community to build technology that will ease this.
[h2]利用技术加强仲裁程序[/h2]ECAF的作用是为案例文件提供最好的支持：可以借助区块链中DApp等技术存储证据和进展信号。ECAF正在与社区的一些成员合作，开发技术从而使这个问题得到缓解／解决。
[h2]Funding[/h2]ECAF is currently composed of predominantly unpaid volunteers. In order to allow ECAF to finish putting in place some of the necessary structure it needs, ECAF will commence charging for its services.
It will implement a 3 stage fee system comprised of the following elements:
1 Non-refundable filing fee: to be paid on submission of a case. This fee will be waived for the 27 frozen accounts.
2 Final admin fee: to be paid when the case is accepted and an Arbitrator assigned
3 Arbitrator fees: to be paid at the conclusion of the case and to compensate the Arbitrators and Case Managers for the time they have spent on the case
4 Fees are separate from the Bond that parties may be required to post as surety against potential judgments
[h2]资金[/h2]ECAF目前主要由无偿志愿者组成。为了让ECAF能够完成它所需要的一些必要性的结构，ECAF将开始对不同的服务进行收费。
将会实施一套三个等级的收费制度，包括以下内容:
1、不做退还的申请费用：在提交案件时支付。这27个冻结账户的费用将被免除；
2、最终管理费：当案件被受理并指派仲裁员时支付；
3、仲裁员费用：在案件结案时支付，并为仲裁员和案件管理人在案件上所花费的时间付费；
4、费用与当事人可能被要求提供担保的押金（Bond）是分开的，以防止潜在的判决。
[h1]Other points worth noting[/h1][h1]其他值得注意的点[/h1][h2]Case transparency and the Presentation of evidence[/h2]1 The process in RDR is thus: In the Ruling, the Arbitrator will combine a presentation of Findings together with the logic of the rules or law. When confidentiality is required, the Arbitrator will explain why evidence is not made public.
2 Although the community treasures the approach of full transparency, this is simply not possible in dispute resolution. Some essential privacy and confidentiality must be maintained so that the Arbitrator can encourage the presentation of full evidence to reach the facts of the case.
3 In contrast, transparency of the case file is a valuable tool for oversight, community confidence and training.
4 Therefore the Arbitrator has to walk a fine line. The Arbitrator remains in control of what evidence is surfaced in every case - it is by its nature a subjective decision that can only be made with the very case in mind.
[h2]案件透明度和证据的提供[/h2]1、RDR的过程是这样的:在裁决中，仲裁员将把调查结果的陈述与规则或法律的逻辑结合在一起。当需要保密时，仲裁员将解释为什么某些证据不公开。
2、尽管社区非常珍视完全透明的方法，但这在解决纠纷中是不能尽善尽美地完成的。必须保持一些基本的隐私和机密性，以便仲裁员能够鼓励提供充分的证据，以达到案件的事实。
3、相反，案件档案的透明度是监督社区信任和教育的宝贵工具。
4、因此，仲裁员必须谨慎行事。仲裁员仍然掌握着在每一个案件中出现的证据——从本质上来说，这是一种主观的决定，只有在考虑到这个案件时才能做出决策。
[h2]Arbitrators[/h2]A diverse pool of Arbitrators are required to deal with cases filed by non-English speaking individuals. Efforts to recruit Arbitrators and Case Managers with a variety of languages skills will continue.
[h2]仲裁员[/h2]需要有各种各样的仲裁员来处理非英语人士提出的申诉。我们将继续努力招聘具有不同语种的仲裁员和案例管理人员。
[h1]What next?[/h1][h1]下一步是什么?[/h1][h2]Status under the current Constitution[/h2]Under the current EOS Constitution ECAF has the mandate to resolve disputes relating to the blockchain and will continue to exercise this mandate.
[h2]在现行公约（Constitution）下的地位[/h2]根据现行的EOS公约（Constitution），ECAF有权解决与此区块链有关的纠纷，并将继续行使这一职权。
[h2]Cases are processed by their Arbitrators according to the RDR.[/h2]This is the normal process, and is designed to ensure that all sides have a fair chance to present their case, so that the Arbitrator can produce a fair ruling that fits the case.
[h2]案件由他们的仲裁员根据RDR规则处理[/h2]这是正常的程序，目的是确保各方都有公平的机会提出他们的案件，以便仲裁员能够作出符合案件的公平裁决。
[h2]Frozen accounts[/h2]As of this time, multiple accounts have been frozen by duly issued orders from their assigned Emergency Arbitrators. The freezing of those accounts is not the end, but actually the starting point for the process to figure out who should be the rightful owner where multiple people seem to have a claim on it. Contrary to the public perception, these are complex cases to resolve as they involve multiple blockchains, including multiple smart contracts, as well as some websites and possible contracts established there. We believe that there is currently no other organisation, in, or outside EOS, that is setup to deal with the complexity of these issues.
ECAF accepts that communication with Claimants regarding their cases has been slow. Going forward ECAF commits to providing them with regular updates on their case status.
[h2]冻结账户[/h2]截至目前，多个账户已被其指定的紧急仲裁员发出的正式命令冻结。冻结这些账户并不是最终的结果，在这个过程中，许多人似乎都对这些账户拥有所有权。与公众的看法相反，这些都是复杂的案件，因为涉及到不同的链，包括多个智能合同，以及一些网站和可能的合同。我们认为，目前除了在EOS内，没有任何其他组织能够处理这些问题的复杂性。
ECAF承认与申诉人进行案件的沟通是缓慢的事实。未来的ECAF承诺向公众提供案件进展最新的更新情况。
[h2]Arbitrator Ratification[/h2]Once the referendum contract is in place, ECAF will be seeking token holder ratification of its slate of arbitrators.
[h2]仲裁员批准[/h2]一旦全民公投合约生效，ECAF将寻求代币持有人认同批准其仲裁员名单。
[h2]Alternative Constitutions[/h2]EOS is and always was intended to be a governed blockchain. For this purpose ECAF was set up to be the primary, default and base layer forum of dispute resolution. A new constitution, if ratified, could include alternative approaches such as there being many arbitration forums, or an absence of base layer arbitration.
As this is a highly charged and political proposal, ECAF will not formally comment on it but instead will allow the individuals within ECAF to debate.
[h2]替代的公约[/h2]EOS一直是一个受治理的区块链。为了这个目的，ECAF被设置为主要的、默认和基础的解决纠纷的论坛。新版公约（constitution）如果得到批准，可以开始尝试不同形式，如有多个仲裁论坛，或缺少基础层面的仲裁。
由于这是一个充满争议的政治提议，ECAF不会正式对此发表评论，但允许ECAF内部人员进行讨论。
[h2]Provider of Arbitration services[/h2]ECAF sees itself as being a full-stack provider of EOS Arbitration services, and will continue to provide either full or speciality services according to the mandate expressed in a blockchain Constitution or other contract. ECAF’s trained Arbitrators and Case Managers will be an excellent choice for dispute resolution services for DApp writers and communities throughout the EOS ecosystem.
[h2]仲裁服务的提供者[/h2]ECAF认为自己是一个完整的EOS仲裁服务提供者，并将继续根据区块链公约（Constitution）或其他合约规定的授权的范围内提供全面或定制的服务。ECAF训练有素的仲裁员和案例管理人员将是整个EOS生态系统的DApp作者和社区解决纠纷的最佳选择。
[h1]Conclusion[/h1][h1]结论[/h1]Like any new organisation ECAF has experienced growing pains. We are learning and growing stronger as an organisation.
If you’d like to learn more or support ECAF’s work then you can:
就像任何一个新的组织一样，ECAF也在经历成长的痛苦。作为一个组织，我们正在不断学习和成长。
如果你想了解更多或支持ECAF的工作，那么你可以:
本文图片来源于网络
相关文章：
We are EOShenzhen
不同入口如何投票：
imToken
火币
portal
关于我们更多联系：
Website：https://eoshenzhen.io
Steem：https://steemit.com/@eoshenzhen
Busy：https://busy.org/@eoshenzhen
Telegram：https://t.me/eoshenzhen
Twitter：https://twitter.com/eostechlover
论坛：EOS技术爱好者
新浪微博：EOSTechLover
EOShenzhen的投票账号：eoshenzhenio
![]()
EOShezhen
|
|
转播
